Light Touch in the Operating Room
What Is Reiki, an Alternative Energy Therapy, Doing in a Mainstream Medical Institution? That's Just What Researchers Hope to Learn
Tuesday, July 26, 2005; Page HE01
But Does It
Work?
Contemporary articles for today's Reiki Practitioner. I Would like to add here that the articles contained on this page are merely a reflection of how Reiki is perceived by other practitioners and may not always reflect my personal view point. If any of these articles conflict with your current view or offend you I offer you to make your submissions to my Contact Us Page. I feel that all views must be considered in order to have a more fuller understanding of how reiki in today's times is being discussed and taught.
| Heart Failure and complementary
Healing By David Powell OBE Dec 22, 2004, 15:20 |
Email this article Printer friendly page |
© Copyright 2002 Heart UK Ltd
![]()
Tuesday, July 26, 2005; Page HE01
But Does It
Work?
![]()
February 22, 2005
|
|||||||||||||||
The first Reiki practitioner in our OR -
operating room
AORN Journal,
March,
1998 by Jeanette
Sawyer
A few months ago, as a clinical coordinator in a busy 16-room OR, I received an unusual request from a surgeon. He asked if it would it be possible for a patient's "healer," a Reiki (pronounced ray-kee) practitioner, to be present during a surgical laparoscopic procedure. I was pleased that the surgeon had taken The time to discuss issues that were important to the patient, but at the same time, this request led to many other questions and concerns. I wondered what risks were involved. Who should I contact for the answers, and who could make the decision to allow the healer to accompany the patient into the OR?
First, I voiced my concerns to the director of perioperative services and the medical director of the OR. Some of the questions that arose were: What were the risks of having a nonmedical person in the room during surgery? What would occur if there were problems with intubation or if the equipment malfunctioned? Who was this "healer," and what was she actually going to do with or to the patient? Would the whole team have to support her function? Could she be asked to leave at any time during the procedure? Was she a nurse? Would we be liable for anything she might say or do? Did she have OR experience?
We contacted the risk management department and scheduled a meeting that included me. the hospital's lawyer, the perioperative services and medical directors, an anesthesiologist, and the surgeon to determine how to handle this situation legally and still satisfy the patient's request. Everyone agreed that the practitioner should be allowed into the OR if both she and the patient signed a waiver consent stating that everything in the OR was confidential, that the patient did indeed want the practitioner present, and that the practitioner could be asked to leave at any time. Also, we agreed that I would present a brief overview to the practitioner about OR-specific OSHA standards on the morning of the procedure and stay with her while she was in the OR. The anesthesiologist would arrange for an anesthesia care provider who would be comfortable having the practitioner present during the entire procedure.
The gynecology staff nurses were informed and wanted to participate in any way possible that would provide an enhanced atmosphere for the patient's comfort and well-being. Everyone seemed very comfortable with all the arrangements that had been made.
Being an open-minded person. I had always been interested in the holistic approach to healing, and I realize that there are some things about the human body that are not fully understood. I believe that combining complementary medicine with conventional treatments can lead to a better outcome for the patient. Many nurses have known for years the power of transpersonal relationships in healing, and although this had never been openly practiced in our OR, I was willing to give it a try.
On the morning of surgery, I met Ms R, the practitioner, and Mrs J, the patient, who was a very apprehensive 45-year-old woman in the same day surgery program area. Mrs J was concerned about undergoing the surgical procedure as she had experienced a poor outcome from a previous procedure. She was extremely pleased that her request to have a practitioner with her during surgery had been honored.
Ms R explained that she was going to use Reiki as the adjunct therapy. Reiki is a type of energy medicine that is noninvasive and is a hands-on healing art. It is a relaxation technique that acts through the autonomic nervous system to lower the blood pressure and heart rate to relieve tension and anxiety. This relaxation is said to assist the abilities of the immune system to defend against bacteria and viruses. It helps stimulate the brain's production of endorphins; that act to decrease the perception of pain and create a state of well-being.
Mrs J had an audiotape of music that she had selected to be played via headphones as she was being inducted and Ms R would read and repeat certain statements during the procedure. After the nurse made her preoperative visit and Mrs J and Ms R signed the special consent, we proceeded to the OR suite.
The OR environment was quiet and relaxed. Mrs J had the headphones in place and the music was on. Ms R stood at the Mrs J's side and held her hand. The induction was smooth. Ms R began to read the statements in a low monotone that did not interfere with any conversation in the surgical field.
After a flawless procedure, Mrs J was extubated quietly and was transferred to the postanesthesia care unit with Ms R accompanying her. Mrs J woke as if she had just taken a nap. She did not require any postoperative pain medication and was sitting up and smiling when I visited her approximately 30 minutes later. She thanked everyone for their support and she expressed that she was grateful to have undergone her procedure in an institution that was open to her needs. Mrs J wanted to feel cared for and nurtured and to have a sense of meaning in life. She believed that having this would have an effect on the course of her disease. I believe that these feelings certainly affect outcomes as much as our technical skills and interventions.
Approximately two weeks after her surgery. I telephoned Mrs J at her home to inquire about her experience. She had returned to work and said she felt great. She was very pleased with her surgical outcome. which she attributed in part to the care she received and the presence of her Reiki practitioner during the procedure. Months have now passed and comments are still being made about the serenity and the positive experience in the OR that day!
A statement in our OR policy manual now recognizes that a complementary healer can accompany a patient into the OR after the healer meets the necessary requirements. Hopefully, this will be a common occurrence rather than an unusual event in our OR.
JEANETTE SAWYER, RN, CNOR, is the clinical coordinator for plastics/gynecology and oral surgery. Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH.
COPYRIGHT 1998 Association of Operating Room Nurses, Inc.
COPYRIGHT 2001 Gale Group
| J N Y State Nurses Assoc. 2003 Spring-Summer;34(1):9-13. | Related Articles, Links |
![]()
Scientists investigate the effects of 'distant healing' on patients
|
On an operating table at a medical center in San Francisco, a breast cancer patient is undergoing reconstructive surgery after a mastectomy. But this will be no ordinary surgery. Three thousand miles away, a shamanic healer has been sent the woman's name, a photo and details about the surgery.
For each of the following eight days, the healer will pray 20 minutes for the cancer patient's recovery, without the woman's knowledge. A surgeon has inserted two small fabric tubes into the woman's groin to enable researchers to measure how fast she heals.
The woman is a patient in an extraordinary government-funded study that is seeking to determine whether prayer has the power to heal patients from afar -- a field known as "distant healing."
While that term is probably unfamiliar to most Americans, the idea of turning to prayers in their homes, hospitals and houses of worship is not. In recent years, medicine has increasingly shown an interest in investigating the effect of prayer and spirituality on health. A survey of 31,000 adults released last year by the national Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found that 43 percent of U.S. adults prayed for their own health, while 24 percent had others pray for their health.
Some researchers say that is reason enough to study the power of prayer.
"Almost every community in the world has a prayer for the sick, which they practice when a member of their community is ill," says Mitchell Krucoff, a Duke University cardiologist and researcher in the field of distant prayer and healing. "It is a ubiquitous cultural practice, as far as we can tell. ... Cultural practices in healthcare frequently have a clue. But understanding that clue, learning how to best use it, requires basic clinical science."
Early results
Science has only begun to explore the power of distant healing, and the early results of this research have been inconclusive. In an article published in the Annals of Internal Medicine in 2000, researchers reported on 23 studies on various distant healing techniques, including religious, energy and spiritual healing. Thirteen of the 23 studies indicated there are positive effects to distant healing, nine studies found no beneficial effect and one study showed a modest negative effect with the use of distant healing.
The study of distant healing was once the realm of eccentric scientists, but researchers at such prominent institutions as the Mind/Body Medical Institute in Chestnut Hill, Mass., Duke University Medical Center in North Carolina and the California Pacific Medical Center in San Francisco are involved in the field. And the National Institutes of Health's National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine has spent $2.2 million on studies of distant healing and intercessory prayer since 2000 -- a small fraction of the agency's annual budget, which totaled $117 million in 2004.
Some people think even that relatively small sum of money is not being well spent.
"You can't use science to prove God," says John T. Chibnall, an associate professor of psychiatry at St. Louis University School of Medicine in Missouri, who co-wrote a scathing rebuttal of studies on distant prayer published in the Archives of Internal Medicine in 2001. "We shouldn't waste the money of the government showing that Jesus is 'the man,' " Chibnall says. "Faith is faith. Science is science. Don't use science to strengthen or diminish belief in God."
Studies questioned
While some scientists oppose such studies on religious or scientific grounds, others question whether it is possible to devise a scientifically valid method for measuring something as nebulous as the power of prayer.
What constitutes a "dose" of prayer? How does one define prayer? Is channeling Buddhist intention or reiki energy the same thing as praying to a Judeo-Christian God? And how do you determine whether it was prayer that made a patient better, or something else, such as the placebo effect?
"There are enormous methodological and conceptual problems with the studies of distant prayer," says Richard Sloan, a professor of behavioral medicine at Columbia University in New York. "Nothing in our understanding of our universe or ourselves suggests how the thoughts of one group of people could influence the physiology of people 3,000 miles away."
Cardiologist Randolph Byrd did the first major clinical study on distant healing at San Francisco General Hospital in 1988. He divided 393 heart patients into two groups.
One group received prayers from Christians outside the hospital; the other did not. His study, published in the Southern Medical Journal, found that the patients who were not prayed for needed more medication and were more likely to suffer complications. While it had flaws, the study garnered considerable attention.
Since then investigators have continued to look at the possible effects of remote prayer and similar distant healing techniques in the treatment of heart disease, AIDS and other illnesses as well as infertility. Numerous experiments involving prayer and distant healing have also been done involving animals and plants.
"Critics often complain that if you see positive results in humans it is because of positive thinking, or the placebo response," says Larry Dossey, a retired internist in Santa Fe, N.M., and author of numerous books on spirituality and healing. "Microbes don't think positively, and are not subject to the placebo response."
![]()
The practice of Reiki, which may be as old as 2,500 years, is mentioned in Tibetan sutras and in ancient records of cosmology and philosophy. The name Reiki comes from the Japanese words rei, meaning "universal spirit," and ki, meaning "life energy." The Japanese physician and Buddhist monk Hichau Mikao Usui revitalized the practice of Reiki in the 19th century. Hawayo Tokata introduced Usui Reiki to the West in the 1930s.
Reiki practitioners believe that beneficial effects are obtained from a "universal life energy" that practitioners channel to patients, providing strength, harmony and balance to the body and mind. Reiki aims to treat health problems and to enable patients to feel enlightened, with improved mental clarity, well-being and spirituality. Reiki is sometimes administered to people who are dying, with the goal of instilling a sense of peace. Reiki masters believe that all living beings are affected by universal life energy, and animals may be treated in the same manner as humans.
It has been proposed that Reiki can lower heart rate and blood pressure, boost the immune system, alter hormone levels, stimulate endorphins and affect skin temperature and blood hemoglobin levels. However, these properties have not been well studied or clearly demonstrated in scientific studies.
In Reiki treatments, practitioners position their hands in 12 to 15 different positions, which are held for two to five minutes each. They may place their hands directly on a clothed patient or hold their hands one to two inches above the patient. Practitioners believe that hand positions can cover all of the body systems within 30 to 90 minutes. The number of sessions varies based on the judgment of the practitioner. Participants have reported warmth, tingling, sleepiness, relaxation or invigoration during Reiki.
Sometimes a technique called sweeping is used at the beginning of a session; sweeping involves the practitioner passing hands over the patient. This technique is proposed to allow the practitioner to detect areas of energy disruption, imbalance or blockage and allows the practitioner to cleanse patients of negative feelings, emotions or physical burdens.
|
Autonomic nervous system function
|
|
One randomized trial suggests Reiki may have an effect on autonomic
nervous system functions, such as heart rate, blood pressure, or
breathing activity. Large, well-designed studies are needed before
conclusions can be drawn.
|
|
Depression and stress
|
|
There is evidence that Reiki can reduce symptoms of distress when
compared with placebo. More information is needed before a conclusion
can be drawn.
|
|
Pain
|
|
Patients in a preliminary ("phase II") trial of Reiki in
combination with standard pain medications (with opioids) were
reported to experience improved pain control. Further research is
needed to confirm these findings.
|
|
Stroke recovery
|
|
In a randomized controlled trial, Reiki did not have any clinically
useful effect on stroke recovery in patients receiving appropriate
rehabilitation therapy. Selective positive effects on mood and energy
were noted.
|
Reiki has been suggested for many other uses, based on tradition or on scientific theories. However, these uses have not been thoroughly studied in humans, and there is limited scientific evidence about safety or effectiveness. Some of these suggested uses are for conditions that are potentially life-threatening. Consult with a health care provider before using Reiki for any use.
| Addiction Adjunct to surgery AIDS Alcoholism Allergies Anemia Anger Anxiety Arthritis Asthma Bone marrow transplant support Brain damage Breast cancer Broken bones Cancer Cardiopulmonary resuscitation Cardiovascular disease Cardiovascular risk reduction Carpal tunnel syndrome Cellulitis Cervical dysplasia Chemical burns Chronic pain Diabetes Diabetic neuropathy Diabetic wound healing Drug withdrawal Emotional problems Emphysema Epilepsy Fatigue Fibromyalgia Gallstones Grief Guillain-Barré syndrome (a type of nerve damage) Guilt Headache Heart attack Hemophilia Hemorrhoids |
Hernia Herpes zoster Hiccough High blood pressure HIV HIV-related pain and anxiety Hysterectomy Impotence Labor Mental problems Migraine headache Multiple sclerosis Muscle spasms Nervous system function Neuropathy Nosebleeds Postoperative pain Post-traumatic stress disorder Pregnancy Promotion of healing Prostate problems Psoriasis Radiation sickness Rash Recovery from anesthesia Reduction of adverse effects of chemotherapy and radiation Reflex sympathetic dystrophy Relaxation Rheumatoid arthritis Sickle cell anemia Sinus congestion Suicide prevention Systemic lupus erythematosus Trauma Tremor Ulcers Varicose veins Venereal diseases Warts Wound healing |
Reiki is not recommended as the sole treatment for potentially serious medical conditions, and its use should not delay the time it takes to consult with a health care provider or receive established therapies. Serious adverse effects have not been reported in association with Reiki. Some Reiki practitioners believe that Reiki should be used cautiously in individuals with psychiatric illnesses.
Reiki has been suggested for many health conditions, but it is not well studied scientifically. Reiki should not be used alone to treat potentially dangerous medical conditions, although it may be used in addition to more proven medical treatments. Speak with your health care provider if you are considering Reiki therapy.
Selected Scientific Studies: Reiki
Natural Standard reviewed more than 135 articles to prepare the professional monograph from which this version was created.
Some of the more recent studies are listed below:
![]()
